This post was published in 2022-07-06. Obviously, expired content is less useful to users if it has already pasted its expiration date.
不同PDF查看器对PDF文件的渲染细节对比
使用同一个PDF文件:https://truxton2blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/20220709_010554_AMOnc.pdf,这个PDF文件本质上是一个特别特别长的图片文件。
测试时间:2022-07-10;测试平台:macOS Monterey 12.4
Chrome:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05a62/05a62efe2dbe153bb7c0635981b2dca91f288180" alt=""
Edge:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68bcd/68bcdba56a0b81a8a2c1d268cdf8925990952e81" alt=""
Safari :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/413e8/413e862903ba3ce6eef4cdfb426754171b8151f6" alt=""
Firefox(应该是使用了pdf.js 2.x) :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0eb31/0eb31f77e6f8f58e9de416f0c303fe13a90ce371" alt=""
Adobe acrobat pro :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/669d4/669d46a87a6939f3ae8cb5b55c239b9b5954db76" alt=""
macOS preview.app :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1655/c1655cb7f065c23cc8c3d7773d4e6a639ad74c35" alt=""
macOS PDF expert:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa6a4/fa6a4cc820c8ea3482a9f165559fd3a4fa642efd" alt=""
结论:
(主观层面上)preview.app效果最好;acrobat效果最差;PDF.js最模糊。考虑到兼容性问题,本站将继续使用PDF.js。
2022-10-31更新,在macOS Ventura平台上测试pdf.js 3.0.279:
pdf.js 3.0.279:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f753/2f7535ed1e85797503233cc500e601b7b29c43a1" alt=""
2024-10-07更新,在macOS Ventura平台上测试pdf.js 4.7.76:
pdf.js 4.7.76:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eec2b/eec2b197783bd019d44716985b88b17b62faa508" alt=""
看起来渲染模糊的问题应该是修好了。
Last Modified in 2024-10-07